Who goes to the moon anymore?
Summary:
- Various agencies are planning manned missions to the moon.
- NASA and China National Space Administration plan both to reach the moon and beyond in various stages.
- Private companies are testing innovative space rockets, with the goal of eventually reaching Mars.
- The current space race involves a mix of private companies and government agencies.
The last moon landing took place in the early seventies, against a backdrop of waning interest in space exploration [1]. Fast-forward over 50 years, and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration’s (NASA) Artemis mission to reach the moon, and eventually Mars, has been met with anything from excitement to conflicted indifference. There has been a fair bit of push-back about the whole program, with critics slating it as unnecessary spending [2] [3]. Former deputy administrator of NASA, Lori Garner, even stated: “I don’t believe the way we are going about it is sustainable because we are using outdated and expensive single-use technologies” [4].
This article will look at the current state of the new space race, and who is involved in it.
Times have changed, and so have the frontrunners in the new space race. The original US/Soviet space race was largely motivated by a wish for military-tech supremacy [5], and fizzled out by the mid-70s amid political and economic fatigue. The space program was financially prohibitive, costing an estimated 150 billion dollars in modern terms [6]. NASA then spent the next few decades focusing on a variety of other projects such as the International Space Station and the Mars Rover robotic explorer.
NASA has now returned to the field with the Artemis program. In the NASA tradition of Greek mythological naming, their current space-race reboot is named after the twin sister of Apollo (their first space program). The Artemis mission has three stages: an unmanned test in 2022, a manned lunar orbit and return in 2024, and a manned lunar landing in 2025 [7] [8]. After a series of technological misfires, Artemis 1 launched from the Kennedy Space Center on November 16th, 2022. The unmanned capsule successfully touched back down on December 11th [9].
We mentioned this is a space race [10]; so, who are the other runners? China is also pursuing space travel, with advancing plans to build a lunar base with Russia, and building its own space station. In 2019, the China National Space Administration became the first agency to land a robotic craft on the dark side of the moon [11]. The state-owned China Aerospace Science and Technology company also recently announced plans to update its rockets to handle manned lunar missions by 2030. This led to several Chinese space-related organizations being placed on the U.S. administration’s Entity List, restricting their access to U.S. technology [12].
Private industry also plays a role in space travel. SpaceX is a 20-year-old private company that designs and builds satellites and spaceships with a view to colonizing Mars [13]. They developed the Falcon 9 launch vehicle and complementary Crew Dragon spacecrafts, which contain many reusable parts. Their new Starship craft is at the cutting edge of space travel [14]. SpaceX is the first company to reuse a space rocket, and the first private company to dock a spacecraft at the International Space Station; with comparatively cheap, powerful, reusable rockets that apparently outperform anything currently being developed by NASA [15]. In stark contrast to NASA’s mostly one-time-only tech, this provides a fast turnaround for relaunches. There are several privately funded competitors of SpaceX and NASA [16], such as Blue Origin, who have developed a partially reusable space system [17].
Advantages of private-sector space travel are that the taxpayer does not pay for it, and companies with shareholders tend to have an interest in keeping costs down. This is also the disadvantage of private-sector space travel; particularly when compared to the careful test-based approach of NASA. However, as NASA regularly outsources work to private companies, the line between private and public endeavor is beginning to blur. Apart from being a competitor, SpaceX is also one of NASA’s biggest subcontractors, and currently developing the human lander that will eventually bring astronauts to the lunar surface [18]. The U.S. military has also expressed an interest in SpaceX’s Big Falcon Rocket for use in earth-orbit-based transport [19].
So, who goes to the moon anymore? Various governmental agencies across the world are planning lunar trips, but either as subcontractors or under their own flag, private industry plays an increasingly key role in space exploration.
References:
[2] NASA’s unnecessary $504 million lunar orbit project doesn’t help us get back to the Moon | The Hill
[3] NASA’s Artemis Rocket Is a Gigantic Waste of Money – The Washington Post
[4] Should We Still Be Sending Astronauts to Space? – The New York Times (nytimes.com)
[5] Science, New Series, Vol. 163, No. 3868, 1969, pp. 649-654.
[7] Artemis-I | NASA
[8] Why NASA’s next Artemis mission won’t launch until 2024 at the earliest | Space
[9] Artemis I – Artemis (nasa.gov)
[10] Anthill presents: To the moon and beyond (theconversation.com)
[11] China Makes Historic Landing on ‘Dark Side’ of the Moon – HISTORY
[12] U.S., China in new space race with Artemis lunar rocket launch – Nikkei Asia
[13] https://www.spacex.com/human-spaceflight/mars/
[14] SpaceX now dominates rocket flight, bringing big benefits—and risks—to NASA | Science | AAAS
[15] SpaceX vs NASA: Are They Different and Do They Work Together? – History-Computer
[16] https://www.alphr.com/blue-origin-vs-spacex/
[17] 471971main_NNJ10TA02S_blue_origin_SAA_R.pdf (nasa.gov)
[18] NASA’s Decade in Space: The Highs and Lows of the US Space Agency’s 2010s | Space