Health and Medicine
How much of our brain do we really use?
15/02/2023

How much of our brain do we really use?

Summary:

  • The saying that humans use only 10% of their brains has been around for decades.
  • The origin of the saying stems from the early 1900s, with many references in pop culture since then.
  • Current research shows we use multiple brain regions simultaneously to process stimuli.
  • All regions of the brain are active to a certain degree over the course of a day.
  • Using only 10% of our brain at any time is now considered a common “neuromyth”.

The human brain is as complex as it is fascinating. While neuroscience can sometimes be challenging to explain in layman’s terms, there is at least one phrase that seems to be common knowledge globally: people only use 10% of their brains. This has led to the idea that humans are sitting on limitless unlocked potential. Examples can be seen in pop culture where the dormant 90% is awakened to increase intelligence or gain superpowers, and real-life scientific geniuses have been described as using a higher percentage of their brain than the average Joe.

The aim of this article is to explore how the concept of using 10% of our brain became so widely known and whether evidence from modern neuroscience supports it.

Though the exact origin is difficult to pinpoint, Harvard psychologist William James stated as early as the 1900s that only a fraction of a person’s full mental potential is ever met [1]. Soon thereafter, the 10% value could be seen popularised in advertisements from the 1920s and in popular culture in the 1930s, from science fiction to self-help books [2] [3]. Another origin story claims it was a misinterpretation of neurological research in the 19th and 20th centuries, as theories surrounding the function and even the importance of various brain regions were still in their early stages [4]. Albert Einstein has also been credited with explaining his own brilliance by referencing the 10% idea. However, there is no official record of him stating this in the Albert Einstein Archives [5].

Regardless of its origin, the phrase in question has been around for many decades [6]. What, then, have recent neurobiology studies found out about our daily brain use?

Neuroscientists are able to assess which parts of the brain are active at a given point through special imaging techniques, such as positron emission tomography (PET) and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). The former uses a radioactive compound that marks metabolically active tissue [7], while the latter follows the path of oxygenated blood through the regions of the brain [8]. Increases in metabolism and oxygen are therefore indicators of neuronal activity [7] [8] and show what our brains are doing under different conditions. Whether we’re learning to solve puzzles [9], “resting” (i.e. doing nothing) [10] or sleeping [11], research indicates that all three major parts of the brain are active to a certain extent over the course of a day. The cerebrum has many functions, including speech, learning and sensory processing, the brainstem is involved in involuntary actions like heart rhythm and breathing, and the cerebellum controls muscle movements and balance [12].

Additionally, the different regions of the brain need to communicate in order to process multisensory information, such as sight and sound simultaneously, which can involve large areas of the brain [13]. When playing musical instruments, for example, the primary auditory cortex listens to the music [14], the cerebellum is involved in memorising sequences of movements [15] and various areas of the cortex and sub-cortex are involved in timing [16].

Furthermore, the brain is continuously working to remodel itself. As babies, we make many more connections between neurons than are necessary for a functioning adult brain, and these need to be cut back in a process called synaptic pruning. Synaptic pruning happens rapidly until puberty and more slowly through adulthood [17]. If 90% of the brain were continuously inactive and therefore unnecessary, neuroscientist Dr. Barry Beyerstein argued that the adult brain should then reveal extensive levels of degradation due to synaptic pruning, which has not been shown to be the case [18]. Similarly, the neural connections formed across different brain areas are continuously being “rewired” based on our experiences [19], so, ultimately, the brain is a very active organ.

In summary, there is an ever-increasing body of evidence contrasting the decades-old saying that humans only use 10% of their brain. Efforts have been made by neuroscientists [16] and psychologists [6] alike to dispel this notion as a myth for many years. Hence, when we ask a search engine nowadays how much of our brain we use, the first results inform us that the 10% saying is a common “neuromyth”. Advice for improving brain function is instead related to preventing mental decline as we age, such as physical exercise and performing mentally stimulating activities (e.g. crossword puzzles and maths problems) [20], rather than unlocking hitherto untapped potential.

Overall, the consensus among neuroscientists is that humans use many parts of the brain at any given time, with signals being coordinated in multiple areas of the brain through our conscious and subconscious actions.

References

  1. James, W. (1907). “The Energies of Men”. The Philosophical Review, vol. 16, no. 1, p. 12.
  2. Campbell, John W. (Spring–Summer 1932). “Invaders from the Infinite”. Amazing Stories Quarterly. p. 216.
  3. Carnegie, D. (1936). “How to win friends and influence people”. New York: Simon and Schuster.
  4. Aamodt, S. & Wang, S. (2008). “Welcome to your brain: Why you lose your car keys but never forget how to drive and other puzzles of Everyday Life”. New York: Bloomsbury.
  5. Beyerstein, B.L. (2004). “Do we really use only 10 percent of our brains?”. Scientific American. Scientific American. Available at: https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/do-we-really-use-only-10/ (Accessed: January 3, 2023).
  6. Higbee, K.L. & Clay, S.L. (1998). College Students’ Belief in the Ten-Percent Myth. The Journal of Psychology 132 (5), p. 469-476.
  7. Tai YF & Piccini P (2004). Applications of positron emission tomography (PET) in neurology. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry 75, p. 669-676.
  8. Logothetis, N., Pauls, J., Augath, M., Trinath, T. & Oeltermann, A. (2001). Neurophysiological investigation of the basis of the fMRI signal. Nature 412, p. 150–157.
  9. van Mier, H., Tempel, L.W., Perlmutter, J.S., Raichle, M.E. & Petersen, S.E. (1998). Changes in Brain Activity During Motor Learning Measured With PET: Effects of Hand of Performance and Practice. Journal of Neurophysiology 80(4), p. 2177-2199.
  10. Fransson, P. (2005). Spontaneous low-frequency BOLD signal fluctuations: An fMRI investigation of the resting-state default mode of brain function hypothesis. Human Brain Mapping 26(1), p. 15-29.
  11. McCarley, R.W. & Massaquoi, S.G. (1992). Neurobiological structure of the revised limit cycle reciprocal interaction model of REM cycle control. Journal of Sleep Research 1(2), p. 132-137.
  12. Brain anatomy and how the brain works (2021). Johns Hopkins Medicine. Available at: https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/health/conditions-and-diseases/anatomy-of-the-brain (Accessed: February 5, 2023).
  13. Alais, D., Newell, F., & Mamassian, P. (2010). Multisensory Processing in Review: from Physiology to Behaviour. Seeing and Perceiving 23(1), p. 3-38.
  14. Hyde, K.L., Peretz, I. & Zatorre, R.J. (2008). Evidence for the role of the right auditory cortex in fine pitch resolution. Neuropsychologia 46(2), p. 632-9.
  15. Penhune, V.B. & Doyon, J. (2005). Cerebellum and M1 interaction during early learning of timed motor sequences. Neuroimage 26(3), p. 801-12.
  16. Zatorre, R.J. & Halpern, A.R. (2005). Mental concerts: musical imagery and auditory cortex. Neuron 47(1), p. 9-12.
  17. Navlakha, S., Barth, A.L. & Bar-Joseph, Z. (2015). Decreasing-Rate Pruning Optimizes the Construction of Efficient and Robust Distributed Networks. PLoS Computational Biology 11(7), e1004347.
  18. Beyerstein, B.L. (1999). “Whence Cometh the Myth that We Only Use 10% of our Brains?”, in Sergio Della Sala (ed.). Mind Myths: Exploring Popular Assumptions About the Mind and Brain. Wiley. p. 3–24.
  19. Citri, A. & Malenka, R. (2008). Synaptic Plasticity: Multiple Forms, Functions, and Mechanisms. Neuropsychopharmacology 33, p. 18–41.
  20. 12 ways to keep your brain young (2022). Harvard Health. Available at: https://www.health.harvard.edu/mind-and-mood/12-ways-to-keep-your-brain-young (Accessed: February 11, 2023).
  21. PET/MRI scan (2017). Stanford Medicine Health Care. Available at: https://stanfordhealthcare.org/medical-tests/p/pet-mri-scan.html (Accessed: February 5, 2023).
  22. Huettel, S.A., Song, A.W. & McCarthy, G. (2009). Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (2 ed.), Massachusetts: Sinauer.
  23. McRobbie, D.W. (2007). MRI from picture to proton. Cambridge, UK; New York: Cambridge University Press.
  24. Purves, D., Augustine, G.J., Fitzpatrick, D., et al., editors (2001). Neuroscience. 2nd edition. Sunderland (MA): Sinauer Associates. The Auditory Cortex.
  25. Sereno, I. M., Diedrichsen, J., Tachrount, M., Testa-Silva, G., d’Arceuil, H. & De Zeeuw, C. (2020). The human cerebellum has almost 80% of the surface area of the neocortex. PNAS 117(32), p. 19538-19543.
  26. Roberts, P. (1992). Neuroanatomy (3rd ed.). Springer-Verlag. p. 86–92.
  27. Azevedo, F.A.C., Carvalho, L.R.B., Grinberg, L.T., et al. (2009). Equal numbers of neuronal and nonneuronal cells make the human brain an isometrically scaled-up primate brain. Journal of Comparative Neurology 513, p. 532-541.
Nicolina Zjacic
0
Tags :