Health and Medicine
Is non-stick cookware safe to use?

Is non-stick cookware safe to use?

Summary:

  • Many non-stick cookware items contain chemicals called PFAS, that have been indicated in multiple health issues.
  • Overheating non-stick cookware damages it and releases toxic fumes.
  • Scratched non-stick coating leads to plastic particles in food that accumulate in the stomach and kidneys.
  • Other cookware options exist, such as stainless steel, cast iron or enamel coated.

Non-stick cookware is amazing; one can easily fry delicate foods like eggs with only miniscule amounts of oil and yet the results are hard to match with most other cookware. Plus, cleaning them after use is a breeze with little to no scrubbing involved. However, over the last decade, increasing evidence points towards a potential health risk associated with a group of chemicals called PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances) that give non-stick cookware its unique characteristics [1]. In this article we take a look at what PFAS are, whether their use in non-stick cookware poses a health risk and what is being done about them. Moreover, we will point out some mistakes to avoid when using non-stick.

Is non-stick cookware safe to use?

PFAS are used in many different products. They make rain jackets water-proof, keep soggy fast food from leaking through the wrapping and are an important component of the foam found in fire extinguishers [2]. They are often used to make surfaces water repellant and to reduce friction. PFAS is an umbrella term for thousands of chemicals including Teflon, which is used in some non-stick cookware [3]. One concerning trait of PFAS is that once they are discarded they degrade over very long time scales; they are also called ‘forever chemicals’. Moreover, they bioaccumulate, meaning that they build up in organisms that are exposed to them over time [1]. In fact, traces of PFAS can be found in the blood of 98% of US citizens [4] and in water samples from across the globe [5, 6]. Some PFAS have been indicated in diverse health issues ranging from thyroid, liver or kidney disease to cancer [7, 8].

One particular PFAS that was specifically found to cause adverse health effects is PFOA (perfluorooctanoic acid), a substance that was used in the manufacturing process of Teflon cookware until 2013. In addition to the aforementioned health conditions, it has been linked to infertility and low birth weight [9, 10]. Since 2013 PFOA has no longer been used in the production of non-stick cookware, yet it is still used in other applications such as in sealants, floor wax or textiles. Hence, unsurprisingly, studies have shown that banning cookware containing PFOA did not significantly decrease overall PFOA exposure [11].

However, many modern non-stick cookware items still contain other PFAS whose potential health effects, especially long term, are often unclear [12]. Generally, new types of PFAS are often used without toxicological studies, which has led to an ambiguous picture of PFAS biosafety [12]. Therefore, some governments are passing precautions legislation – the European Union has started to ban certain PFAS [13] and the US state Maine has even passed a law that will prohibit the sale of products containing PFAS from 2030 on [14].

Apart from PFAS, non-stick cookware can cause adverse health effects if used incorrectly. Usually, the non-stick coating will start to deteriorate when heated above 260°C (500°F) [15] – conventional electric stoves reach up to 600°C (1100°F). Such high heat causes the pan to release toxic fumes that, upon inhalation, can cause polymer fume fever [16] – temporary flu-like symptoms that last up to 48h – or, in severe cases, lung damage [17]. Therefore, it is crucial to use non-stick cookware only within the temperature range recommended by the manufacturer.

Moreover, non-stick coating can become damaged by long-term use, sharp objects or dishwashers, causing it to flake off. When such cookware is continued to be used, some of the plastic coating ends up in the food and will be ingested. While Teflon itself has been classified as safe in that regard [18], it still accumulates in internal organs such as the stomach lining or the kidneys [19] and it is unclear what the long term effects of this will be. Consequently, damaged non-stick cookware should be replaced.

Is non-stick cookware safe to use?

So, should we now bin all non-stick cookware that we find in our kitchens? Not necessarily. We should for sure replace them if they were produced before 2013 or if the coating is damaged. Moreover, one should follow some simple rules when using non-stick: Do not overheat them and do not scratch them. Lastly, it is important to note that cookware does not always need to be non-stick. For most dishes, such as fried vegetables, fried meat or sauces, traditional cookware like stainless steel, cast iron or enamelled cookware are valid alternatives.

References:

  1. Evich, M. G. et al. Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances in the environment. Science (1979) 375, (2022).
  2. Glüge, J. et al. An overview of the uses of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS). Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts 22, 2345–2373 (2020).
  3. Sajid, M. & Ilyas, M. PTFE-coated non-stick cookware and toxicity concerns: a perspective. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 24, 23436–23440 (2017).
  4. Shearer, J. J. et al. Serum Concentrations of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances and Risk of Renal Cell Carcinoma. J Natl Cancer Inst 113, 580–587 (2021).
  5. EPA Administrator Regan Announces Comprehensive National Strategy to Confront PFAS Pollution | US EPA. https://www.epa.gov/newsreleases/epa-administrator-regan-announces-comprehensive-national-strategy-confront-pfas.
  6. Gilbert, N. EPA blasted for failing to set drinking water limits for ‘forever chemicals.’ Science (2019) doi: 10.1126/science.aax0193.
  7. Steenland, K. et al. Review: Evolution of evidence on PFOA and health following the assessments of the C8 Science Panel. Environ Int 145, (2020).
  8. Bartell, S. M. & Vieira, V. M. Critical review on PFOA, kidney cancer, and testicular cancer. J Air Waste Manag Assoc 71, 663–679 (2021).
  9. Vélez, M. P., Arbuckle, T. E. & Fraser, W. D. Maternal exposure to perfluorinated chemicals and reduced fecundity: the MIREC study. Hum Reprod 30, 701–709 (2015).
  10. Tarapore, P. & Ouyang, B. Perfluoroalkyl Chemicals and Male Reproductive Health: Do PFOA and PFOS Increase Risk for Male Infertility? Int J Environ Res Public Health 18, (2021).
  11. Trudel, D. et al. Estimating consumer exposure to PFOS and PFOA. Risk Anal 28, 251–269 (2008).
  12. Fenton, Suzanne E et al. “Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substance Toxicity and Human Health Review: Current State of Knowledge and Strategies for Informing Future Research.” Environmental toxicology and chemistry vol. 40, 606-630 (2021)
  13. The race to replace persistent chemicals in our homes – BBC News. https://www.bbc.com/news/business-58595098.
  14. Maine’s ban on ‘forever chemicals’ marks a big win for some scientists | Science | AAAS. https://www.science.org/content/article/maine-s-ban-forever-chemicals-marks-big-win-some-scientists.
  15. Sajid, M. & Ilyas, M. PTFE-coated non-stick cookware and toxicity concerns: a perspective. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 24, 23436–23440 (2017).
  16. Greenberg, M. I. & Vearrier, D. Metal fume fever and polymer fume fever. Clin Toxicol (Phila) 53, 195–203 (2015).
  17. Shimizu, T., Hamada, O., Sasaki, A. & Ikeda, M. Rare disease: Polymer fume fever. BMJ Case Reports 2012, (2012).
  18. Sajid, Muhammad, and Muhammad Ilyas. “PTFE-coated non-stick cookware and toxicity concerns: a perspective.” Environmental science and pollution research international. 24,30 23436-23440 (2017)
  19. Sajid, Muhammad et al. “Impact of nanoparticles on human and environment: review of toxicity factors, exposures, control strategies, and future prospects.” Environmental science and pollution research international vol. 22,6 4122-43 (2015)